Top 12 Conga Competitors & Alternatives for Contract Management

Ask five Conga customers what they use the platform for, and you may get five different answers. One may rely on Composer for document generation, another on Conga CLM for contract management, and another on Conga Sign for execution. Companies with more complex sales processes may also use Conga CPQ to connect pricing and quoting with contracting.

This breadth can be valuable when an organization wants these activities to operate as one connected commercial workflow. Conga can also integrate with CRM, ERP, and other cloud systems through connectors and APIs. Even so, the practical setup depends on how the platform is deployed. Conga CLM for Salesforce, for example, runs on Salesforce and stores contract data there. As a result, templates, permissions, objects, and workflows can become closely tied to the Salesforce environment.

So, before comparing features, buyers need to answer a more basic question: Which part of Conga are we actually replacing? This guide covers the top Conga competitors and alternatives for contract management.

Why Teams Start Looking Beyond Conga

The reason teams evaluate Conga alternatives is not necessarily a lack of functionality. Conga can automate contract creation, review, approval, signature, obligation management, and renewals. Its wider platform also connects contracts with document generation, pricing, quoting, billing, and commercial operations.

However, supporting that breadth can require more implementation and administration than some contract teams need.

G2 currently reports an average implementation time of four months for Conga CLM. Its review summary also identifies complex setup, a steep learning curve, insufficient documentation, and time-consuming implementation as recurring concerns. 

The template issue is also documented by Conga. Its migration guidance notes that related schema and master-data changes may need to be present in the target environment before a template is moved successfully.

That makes template migration a concrete area to check during a replacement project, especially where contract generation depends on Salesforce data or related configuration.

The next step is to identify which parts of the current setup need to move before comparing Conga alternatives.

What Your Team Needs to Replace in Conga

A Conga replacement does not always cover the same set of products and workflows.

The scope may include Conga CLM alone or extend to Composer, Conga Sign, CPQ-connected processes, Salesforce workflows, contract data, and integrations.

The table below separates those components so teams can see what each one contributes to the current setup.

‍

12 Best Conga Competitors for Contract Management in 2026

The platforms below cover different parts of contract management. The right fit depends on whether the priority is Legal-led contracting, configurable workflows, post-signature management, or a more focused document process.

1. SpotDraft

SpotDraft is a context-aware, AI-native CLM for in-house Legal teams. It brings contract workflows, negotiation, e-signatures, repository management, analytics, and AI-assisted review into one contract-management environment.

Key features

• Sets conditional templates, automates approvals, and tracks contracts from draft to signature.
• Supports contract review, redlining, and finalization in Microsoft Word, Slack, and SpotDraft.
• Consolidates agreements in a central repository with search and access controls.
• Reviews contracts against configurable VerifAI Guides and suggests language, comments, and redlines.
• Surfaces renewals, bottlenecks, team workloads, and other contract-process information through analytics.

Pros

• Provides a dedicated implementation team and a setup based on the customer’s contract process.
• Includes contract migration, team training, live templates, approvals, integrations, and dashboards in its published implementation process.
• Provides a dedicated customer success manager, expert onboarding, continuous training, and 24/7 omnichannel support.

Cons

• Linking VerifAI Guides to workflows requires VerifAI for Teams and the relevant AI module.
• The published under-six-week switching timeline can vary according to the nature and complexity of the requirements.
• The Contract Buyout Program requires the customer to sign a SpotDraft contract upfront, although billing begins after the existing CLM contract ends.

2. Ironclad

Ironclad provides AI-powered contract lifecycle management across contract creation, review, signature, storage, analysis, and fulfillment. Its platform includes configurable workflows, contract editing, repository management, and AI-assisted drafting, review, negotiation, and legal research.

Key features

• Configures request forms, contract templates, approval rules, and signature policies through Workflow Designer.
• Supports contract editing, comments, tracked changes, and negotiation through its DOCX-native editor.
• Stores completed agreements and associated structured contract data in the Repository.
• Uses Jurist to support contract drafting, review, negotiation, and legal research.
• Launches and manages contract workflows through the platform interface or API.

Pros

• Allows non-technical contract experts to update contract language, policies, and form fields without changing application code.
• Keeps requesters, negotiators, approvers, and other stakeholders in one workflow.
• Allows Legal Operations and IT responsibilities to be separated through admin groups, including settings that let IT manage integrations and APIs without accessing contract data.

Cons

• API Management requires the relevant API package.
• Some integrations require an additional purchase.
• Security and Data Management features require the Security and Data Pro add-on.

3. DocuSign CLM

DocuSign CLM manages contract creation, collaboration, review, workflow automation, storage, and post-signature tracking. It also supports dynamic document generation, clause libraries, contract-data extraction, and AI-assisted analysis within DocuSign’s agreement-management portfolio.

Key features

• Generates contracts through dynamic templates and populates them with information from systems such as Salesforce.
• Applies conditional rules when agreements contain non-standard terms.
• Stores pre-approved contract language in clause libraries.
• Routes agreements through internal and external reviews with version control.
• Stores agreements in an AI-powered repository and tracks milestones, obligations, and renewals.
• Extracts, analyzes, and reports on contract data using more than 100 pre-trained AI models.

Pros

• Provides more than 100 preconfigured workflow steps for generation, review, approval, signature, and storage.
• Connects with existing tools through pre-built connectors and APIs.
• Supports AI-assisted review, negotiation, summarization, extraction, and contract questions.

Cons

• The product page directs enterprise buyers to contact Docusign for plan and pricing information.
• Some Intelligent Agreement Management allowances vary according to the plan and order start date.
• Automation sends, Agreement Manager documents, custom extraction, and certain document-generation activities may count against applicable plan allowances.

4. Agiloft

Agiloft manages the contract lifecycle from request through renewal. Its platform supports configurable workflows, approvals, data models, automations, contract intelligence, obligation management, and connections with CRM, ERP, e-signature, productivity, storage, and BI systems.

Key features

• Configures workflows, approvals, data models, and automations without writing code.
• Converts contract information into searchable and reportable business intelligence.
• Manages contract activity before signature and obligation and renewal work after execution.
• Uses Astra to compare contract language against standards, recommend revisions, extract commitments, and trigger notifications.
• Connects contract data with ERP, CRM, e-signature, productivity, storage, and business-intelligence systems.

Pros

• Allows approved team members to change processes without opening a support request.
• Provides point-and-click connections with more than 1,000 systems.
• Centralizes contract creation, negotiation, execution, obligation tracking, and renewal management.

Cons

• Agiloft states that backend setup requires some technical expertise.
• The company describes the product as easy for daily users after the initial setup has been completed.
• Standard pricing and a universal implementation duration are not published on the cited product page.

5. LinkSquares

LinkSquares covers contract work from drafting through signature and renewal. Its platform combines contract workflows, repository management, AI-assisted review, agreement summaries, contract search, structured data extraction, and tracking of dates, obligations, risks, and other contract information.

Key features

• Surfaces contract dates, terms, obligations, risks, and performance information.
• Centralizes clauses, templates, playbooks, contract requests, and workflows.
• Automates approval routing, tasks, notifications, and contract processes.
• Reviews and redlines agreements against playbooks through the AI Legal Assistant.
• Produces agreement summaries and supports contract questions and legal research.
• Tracks renewals and other contract events across the portfolio.

Pros

• Uploads and digitizes legacy contracts so they can be searched and reported alongside newer agreements.
• Automatically ingests fully signed Finalize agreements into Analyze by default when customers use both products.
• Allows the AI Legal Assistant to analyze as many as five selected files in one request.

Cons

• Changes made in the Finalize Info tab after an agreement has synced are not reflected in Analyze.
• Related Agreement links created in Finalize do not carry over to Analyze.
• Unsigned attachments and attachments from Adobe Acrobat Sign do not sync into Analyze.
• XLSX files are not eligible for ingestion through the Analyze and Finalize integration.

6. Juro

Juro combines self-serve contract templates, AI-assisted intake and review, and an intelligent repository. Teams can create agreements, bring third-party contracts into workflows, review against playbooks, extract structured data, and query contract information using natural language.

Key features

• Creates agreements from templates controlled by Legal or from information in an integrated CRM or applicant-tracking system.
• Brings third-party agreements into contract workflows.
• Reviews and redlines contracts against user-defined playbooks.
• Uses AI Extract to convert contract terms into structured data.
• Uses Operator to answer questions across contract information in natural language.
• Connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, Slack, Microsoft Word, Docusign, Google Drive, and other systems.

Pros

• Provides source citations with answers returned by Operator.
• Publishes a 99.9% platform-uptime figure.
• States that the platform is SOC 2 Type 2 certified and has processed contracts across more than 85 countries.

Cons

• Operator is limited to 500 completed tasks per customer each month.
• AI Review is limited to 10 reviews per user every two hours.
• Bulk AI Extract is limited to 200 documents in each extraction.

7. Sirion

Sirion’s Contract Performance Management product connects contractual obligations and service-level agreements with operational performance and billing. It tracks commitments, service levels, financial impact, invoice accuracy, and whether contractual obligations are being fulfilled after execution.

Key features

• Tracks the fulfillment of obligations and service-level agreements across all parties.
• Automatically calculates delivered service levels and flags deviations through RAG dashboards.
• Shows completed, upcoming, overdue, and at-risk obligations.
• Sends alerts for upcoming and overdue commitments.
• Calculates the financial effect of missed obligations and service levels.
• Validates invoices against contract terms, pricing, consumption, and performance.

Pros

• Maintains obligations in a centralized repository linked to contracts, counterparties, and service levels.
• Breaks master obligations into child obligations and recurring tasks.
• Supports bulk obligation management, performance reporting, payment adjustments, penalties, and earnbacks.

Cons

• A unified performance view requires connections with relevant ERP, procure-to-pay, source-to-pay, or IT service-management systems.
• Service-level monitoring requires operational performance data from connected systems.
• Invoice validation requires the applicable contract terms, pricing, consumption, and performance information.

8. Icertis

Icertis Contract Management combines a centralized contract system of record with standardized workflows, contract intelligence, and enterprise-system integrations. It supports contract ingestion, structured data extraction, creation, review, governance, obligations, and fulfillment.

Key features

• Ingests legacy and third-party agreements into a central repository.
• Converts unstructured agreements into structured, searchable contract data.
• Answers natural-language questions across contracts through Vera Copilot.
• Uses approved templates and clause libraries during contract creation.
• Supports contract review and redlining in Microsoft Word.
• Manages contract work through SAP, Microsoft, Salesforce, Workday, and other connected systems.

Pros

• Provides role-based controls and self-service administration for standardized workflows.
• Preserves contract records, relationships, version history, and structured information in a governed repository.
• Covers contract creation, negotiation, approval, execution, post-execution governance, obligations, and fulfillment.

Cons

• Icertis publishes a six-phase implementation process rather than a single setup step.
• The Discover and Configure phase can include data migration, integrations, and custom design components.
• The Build and Transfer phases include system testing, documentation, training materials, and post-implementation planning before go-live.

9. PandaDoc

PandaDoc covers document creation, signature, and payment across contracts, proposals, quotes, e-signatures, payments, and CPQ use cases. Its platform includes templates, document editing, approvals, redlining, CRM connections, signature controls, audit trails, and document organization.

Key features

• Creates agreements through customizable templates and a drag-and-drop editor.
• Supports comments, suggested edits, version history, document approvals, and redlining.
• Connects documents with CRM information, workflow automations, and an embeddable API.
• Controls signing order, verifies recipient identity, creates signing groups, and supports remote notarization.
• Records audit trails, user activity, and document-engagement information.
• Organizes Legal documents through folders, tagging, reusable clauses, content controls, and repository search.

Pros

• Handles proposals, quotes, agreements, signatures, and payments within the same document environment.
• States compliance with E-SIGN, UETA, and HIPAA requirements and SOC 2 certification.
• Provides SSO and API-based controls for documents, workspaces, and permissions.

Cons

• The current new redlining experience is an early-access feature available on Business annual and Enterprise annual plans, with a paid add-on required for Business.
• The current redlining workflow does not work with uploaded content.
• Members cannot manage approval workflows or act as approvers, while Collaborators cannot approve documents.

10. DealHub

DealHub provides contract management as part of its quote-to-revenue platform. Its CLM capabilities cover contract generation, clause management, negotiation, approvals, execution, storage, and CRM-connected document workflows alongside CPQ, subscriptions, billing, and revenue intelligence.

Key features

• Creates NDAs, MSAs, and other agreements from dynamic templates.
• Stores approved contract language in a centralized clause library.
• Supports redlining, version comparisons, and guided negotiation workflows.
• Routes agreements through configurable and ad hoc approvals involving Legal, Finance, and other stakeholders.
• Sends real-time alerts when recipients view or interact with contracts.
• Stores completed agreements in a centralized repository.
• Merges CRM information and documents from external sources into contracts.

Pros

• Connects contract management with CPQ, subscriptions, billing, and revenue intelligence.
• Supports workflows used by Sales, Revenue Operations, Finance, and Legal teams.
• Connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics, NetSuite, Docusign, Slack, Gong, and the DealHub API.

Cons

• Standard subscription prices are not published; the pricing page directs buyers to request pricing.
• AI-powered Contract Insights is currently marked as “coming soon” on the CLM product page.
• Contract management is one part of the wider quote-to-revenue platform, so buyers need to establish which products and integrations are included in their proposed package.

11. ContractWorks

ContractWorks provides a secure, AI-powered contract repository, while ContractWorks Premium adds broader lifecycle capabilities. The platform supports contract storage, AI-powered tagging, OCR search, reporting, renewal alerts, e-signature, and, on Premium, drafting, negotiation, and workflow automation.

Key features

• Stores agreements in a central, searchable repository.
• Identifies agreement types, parties, effective dates, renewal terms, and notice windows through AI-powered tagging.
• Locates contracts and contract details through OCR and advanced search.
• Produces custom and scheduled reports.
• Tracks renewals and other important dates through alerts and notifications.
• Sends and files agreements through built-in electronic signature.

Pros

• Includes unlimited users with every current plan.
• Includes onboarding and migration assistance with paid plans.
• Provides a 14-day trial and preserves uploaded contracts, tags, alerts, and user settings when the customer moves to a paid plan.

Cons

• Current plans are divided into allowances of 1,000, 10,000, or 50,000 documents.
• Each plan includes 10 electronic-signature licences; additional licences are sold separately.
• Contract drafting, templates, clause libraries, redlining, approval workflows, collaboration, obligations, and advanced workflow automation require ContractWorks Premium.

12. Concord

Concord provides end-to-end contract management from intake and drafting through approval, signature, storage, and renewal. Its platform includes intake forms, clause management, redlining, approval workflows, e-signature, searchable contract storage, AI extraction, and deadline alerts.

Key features

• Standardizes contract requests through intake forms.
• Maintains pre-approved language in a clause library.
• Supports drafting, redlining, tracked changes, comments, audit trails, and version control.
• Routes agreements for review and approval according to configured rules.
• Provides native e-signature and an integration with Docusign.
• Makes uploaded contracts searchable through bulk upload and AI extraction.
• Sends alerts for renewals, terminations, and other important contract dates.

Pros

• Includes unlimited documents, unlimited e-signatures, and unlimited free viewers and guests in the Essentials plan.
• Publishes standard prices for Essentials, Business, and Enterprise plans.
• Includes AI Copilot and extraction, negotiation tools, deadline reminders, and amendment management in Essentials.

Cons

• Intake forms, approval workflows, custom roles, custom reports, and several business-system integrations begin on the Business plan.
• The clause library, bulk sending, subsidiary management, and Open API begin on the Enterprise plan.
• Each current paid plan includes five users, with separate per-user charges for additional users.

Which Conga Alternative Fits Your Existing Stack?

Product capability is only one part of the decision. The systems already connected to contracting can narrow the shortlist before the team begins detailed demonstrations.

The table below maps common Conga setups to the capabilities buyers should verify in a replacement.

This maps each platform to the product areas emphasized in its current official materials.

For example, a company that mainly relies on Conga for document generation and signature may not need a global enterprise CLM. Conversely, a business with complex obligations, SAP data, and regional governance requirements may find a document-focused product too narrow.

So the existing stack should determine which vendors move into detailed evaluation.

What to Plan Before Migrating Off Conga

A migration from Conga may involve more than copying signed contract files into a new repository. The team may also need to recreate document logic, workflow rules, structured contract data, permissions, reports, and integrations.

That is why migration planning should begin before the vendor is selected.

Key areas to review include:

• Composer templates and document logic: Record each template, query, merge field, conditional rule, clause, output format, data dependency, and generation trigger.
• Salesforce objects and fields: Identify the records, fields, relationships, flows, buttons, triggers, and permissions connected to contract work.
• Historical agreements: Decide which contracts, amendments, attachments, versions, metadata, counterparties, dates, and ownership records need to move.
• Clause libraries: Record approved clauses, fallback language, jurisdictional variations, term exceptions, and associated approval rules.
• Approval workflows: Map Legal, Finance, Security, Procurement, business, and executive approvals, including value- or risk-based thresholds.
• Signature processes: Document signer roles, signing order, authentication, reminders, certificates, and executed-copy storage.
• CPQ dependencies: Identify the products, prices, discounts, quote fields, approval triggers, amendments, and renewal processes passed into contracts.
• Integrations and APIs: List each system that sends or receives contract data and the workflows that depend on that exchange.
• Roles and permissions: Define access for administrators, contract creators, approvers, negotiators, business requesters, and repository users.
• Reports and dashboards: Record the operational, Legal, commercial, renewal, obligation, and compliance reports that must be recreated.
• Testing: Validate generated documents, workflow routing, approvals, migrated data, permissions, signatures, integrations, and reports before launch.
• Ongoing ownership: Assign responsibility for templates, workflows, playbooks, integrations, permissions, reporting, training, and vendor management.

SpotDraft offers a Contract Buyout Program for teams switching from another CLM. It includes a tailored transition roadmap, assisted migration, and the option to go live with SpotDraft before the existing contract expires.

How SpotDraft Fits Teams Moving Beyond Conga

SpotDraft fits in-house Legal teams whose main requirement is end-to-end contract lifecycle management rather than a combined CPQ, billing, pricing, and revenue-management environment.

The platform brings contract intake, creation, review, approvals, negotiation, e-signature, storage, reporting, and analytics into one system. Legal sets the templates, playbooks, approval rules, permissions, and access controls, while business teams can complete routine contract work within those defined processes.

This operating model gives Legal control without requiring the Legal team to carry out every administrative step manually. 

SpotDraft’s core capabilities include:

• Contract Templates: Supports repeatable contract creation using approved templates.
• Contract Workflows: Routes agreements through the right reviews and approvals.
• VerifAI: Applies Legal’s playbooks during review and surfaces terms that need attention.
• Contract Repository: Keeps signed agreements and contract data searchable after execution.

Book a demo with SpotDraft now!