REPORT

The 2025
Contracting Efficiency Benchmarking Report

49%

of legal teams still manage contracts with email. What about you?"

12%

of legal teams have achieved high automation. How do you compare?

60%

of legal teams are positioned as 
business enablers. What about yours?
introduction

Why does contracting efficiency matter ?

Every business outcome starts with a contract. Revenue, partnerships, vendor relationships, and compliance—all depend on how efficiently your organization manages its contracting processes. Most legal teams, however, still operate with disconnected tools, manual workflows, and zero visibility into contract performance.
contracting efficiency estimator

Compare Your Contracting Efficiency With Industry Benchmarks

KEY FINDINGS

Here's what we discovered

We spoke to legal leaders across the U.S to understand their contracting processes.
56%
of legal teams can’t execute standard contracts within a week
That's 6 times slower than best-in-class legal teams who take between 1-3 days.
80%
of legal teams have a high willingness to automate 
Only 4% achieve full automation, speeding contract turnaround ~10%.
49%
of teams still manage contracts with email and shared folders
Causing missed deadlines, lost documents, and 
costly compliance errors
Only
12%
of legal teams report end-to-end 
contract automation
revealing a large opportunity for digital transformation.
77%
of organizations saw a jump in contract volume this year
Is your team equipped to handle a surge in contracts?
Chapter 1

What’s the state of contracting right now?

To understand how modern in-house legal teams manage contracting, we assessed and benchmarked their contracting process across three parameters:
VOLUME
SPEED
AUTOMATION

How many contracts does your team process monthly?

3 out of 4
legal teams process 50+ contracts monthly without proper systems.

How complex are the contracts within your organization?

~90%
rate their contracts as moderate to highly complex

“Our old tool worked for simple contracts, but SpotDraft has been 
a game-changer for more complex workflows.”

Kerry Sheehan
Director of Legal Operations & Compliance at Doral Renewables

Why do some teams fly while others crawl?

We came across a massive performance disparity between high-performing and struggling legal teams. Organizations at the extremes show a massive difference in contract processing speed.

How long do standard contracts, such as NDAs and MSAs, typically take to complete?

1 in 3
legal teams take over 15+ days to complete standard contracts

How do you primarily manage contracts today?

56%
of Legal Teams Still Manage Contracts Like It's 1995—With Email and Word Docs

Ready to find out how smooth your contract workflow really is?

Talk to us
Chapter 2

Is automation the cure-all legal teams need?

Our survey captured how automation is impacting contracting processes for legal teams across industries. What we found is something we like to call ‘The Automation Paradox’. 

Here’s why :
Level 1:
No automation. Everything  from intake to approval is done manually
Level 2:
Basic templates and e-signatures, but manual routing and tracking
Level 3:
Moderate automation with some workflow capabilities
Level 4:
Advanced automation with integrated business systems
Level 5:
End-to-end automation with  AI-powered features
This isn't just about efficiency—it's about competitive survival. Organizations still managing contracts through email are operating at a fundamental disadvantage compared to peers who've implemented strategic automation.

Successful automation, however, isn’t solely about adopting AI tools. Organizations are achieving automation 
sophistication even with basic tools, suggesting that process innovation is outpacing platform adoption.

Successful automation depends more on process design, stakeholder training, 
and optimization than on feature-rich platforms. Organizations with basic tools but well-designed processes often outperform those with sophisticated platforms but poor implementation.

How willing is your organization to automate contracting?

Ed-tech, media, and entertainment companies are the least willing to automate contracting

Ready to find out how smooth your contract workflow really is?

Talk to us
Chapter 3

What do high performing legal teams do differently?

The dramatic performance variations revealed in our survey data—from organizations completing contracts in 1 day to others taking 15+ days—provide valuable insights into what separates efficiency leaders from struggling teams.
HERE’s what we found
Manual contracting takes 19 days—automation brings it down to 3 days
To understand the impact of automation on contracting, we studied how an increase in automation level speeds up contract turnaround for legal teams.
To understand the impact of automation
on contracting, we studied how an
increase in automation level speeds up
contract turnaround for legal teams.
Automation Level x Turnaround time
19 days
15 days
11 days
8 days
6 days
Teams with higher contract automation consistently achieve faster turnaround times for standard contracts.
Organizations at automation level 3 close contracts 8 days faster on average than those at level 1.
HERE’s what we found
Fintech and IT industries lead with 3-4 day
contract turnaround time

Average Efficiency
(Volume x Automation / Turnaround)

Automation increases efficiency by 73%—Each contract workflow delivers more with technology
How did we calculate average contracting efficiency score?
To measure true operational efficiency—not just speed or volume alone—we created a clear, actionable metric that compiles the three most critical levers in contracting.
Monthly contract volume
The number of standard agreements processed by a team each month.
Automation level
Self-reported score, where 
1 is fully manual and 5 is fully automated contracting.
Average turnaround time
The average number of days from contract request to completion.
Efficiency Score =
Monthly Contract Volume x Automation Level
Average Turnaround Time (days)
Why this matters
This metric rewards both scale (handling more contracts) and maturity (higher automation), but crucially penalizes slow processes—so teams only score high if they automate and move fast. A higher score means your operation not only handles more business but closes deals quicker—showcasing real-world throughput, not just theoretical capability.

Ready to find out how smooth your contract workflow really is?

Talk to us
Chapter 4

Understanding future readiness and the evolution of legal teams

We analyze how contract volume growth, automation maturity, and turnaround times combine to reveal not just rising contract demands, but how efficiency and speed empower organizations to scale effectively.

Approximately how much has your contract volume increased year-over-year?

Higher automation maturity clearly correlates with faster contract growth across industries.
Why this matters
Consulting and EdTech lead in automation (levels 4–5) and contract growth (48% and 33% YoY).
IT/SaaS, Finance, Real Estate & Internet Commerce hold steady with mixed automation and 
20–21% growth
Manufacturing and Media/Entertainment lag with low automation (levels 1–2) and slowest growth 
(10% and 7%).

How do you envision your legal team's role evolving over the next 12 months?*

42%
Continuing current reactive support model
40%
Scaling legal support through automation
33%
Using AI tools for more strategic and less administrative tasks
14%
Shifting from ‘bottleneck’ to business enabler through streamlined contracting
*Participants in this survey could choose more than one response
HERE’s what we found
A combined 80% of legal teams are shifting from reactive support to modern, tech-driven strategic roles.
This distribution illustrates a legal ecosystem evolving rapidly in response to rising contract volumes, complexity, and the availability of advanced tech solutions. The emphasis on automation and AI signals 
a profound shift in skill sets, priorities, and operating models—from reactive risk mitigators to proactive partners driving business acceleration.

Ready to find out how smooth your contract workflow really is?

Talk to us

Demographics

To analyze this , we spoke to more than 100 legal leaders across the U.S to understand their contracting processes.
36
General Counsel
28
In-house Attorney
14
Contract Manager
10
Chief Legal Officer
4
Legal Operations Manager
5
Head of Legal and Compliance
With nearly half of respondents being senior legal executives who control budgets and strategy, the findings reflect real strategic intent—not wishful thinking. These leaders have both the power and responsibility to drive transformation.

Whom did we survey?

37.2%
SaaS
16.3%
Finance
9.3%
Manufacturing
8.1%
Healthcare
8.1%
Real-Estate
5.8%
Consulting
4.7%
Marketplace
4.7%
Travel-Tech
3.5%
Media
2.3%
Education
SaaS Companies
Finance
Manufacturing
Healthcare
Real-Estate
Consulting
Marketplace
Travel Industry
Media
Education
37%
of our respondents work 
in IT/SaaS organizations
23.6%
14.6%
19.1%
10.1%
13.5%
19.1%
5000 and above
1001-5000
501-1000
251-500
101-250
50-100
43%
of respondents belong to organizations with 1000+ employees
12.5%
Just me
(1 person)
35.2%
2-5 people
13.6%
6-10 people
19.3%
11-25 people
13.6%
26-50 people
2.3%
200 people
3.4%
Other
Just me (1 person)
2-5 people
6-10 people
11-25 people
26-50 people
200 people
Other
~50%
of respondents operate with a legal team consisting of 1-5 people
CONCLUSION

What does the future of contracting look like?

Legal teams are at a critical turning point. The data shows that moving beyond reactive roles and embracing automation, AI, and streamlined processes is key to handling growing workloads efficiently.

By evolving into proactive business enablers, legal functions can accelerate contract cycles, reduce bottlenecks, and align more closely with business goals. Investing in this transformation will drive agility and competitive advantage in today’s fast-paced market.
contracting efficiency estimator

Compare Your Contracting Efficiency With Industry Benchmarks

Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Conclusion