Introduction

Email is still the default for many teams, but for contracts, it often creates version confusion, long turnaround times, and security risks. Knowledge workers also lose time when toggling between apps just to check status or hunt for the “right” draft; research shows frequent app switching drains productivity and attention.

Independent research from World Commerce & Contracting links value leakage of roughly 9% to weak contract management practices, underscoring why better collaboration and visibility matter.

A better approach is to bring collaboration into one place so every stakeholder works on the same record with tracked changes, clear ownership, and integrated approvals.

‍

1. Real-Time Redlining and Version Control

When contracts move across long email threads, you spend more time finding the “right” version than reviewing the terms. You can avoid that drift by keeping negotiation, edits, and discussion inside a single workspace, such as a CLM tool. Real-time redlining helps you track every change as it happens, and version control ensures everyone works on the same draft.

‍

2. Editing Flexibility That Works for Every Contract Stakeholder

Lawyers prefer drafting and reviewing contracts in Microsoft Word because it gives them precise control over formatting, styling, numbering, and defined terms. It is also where their internal playbooks, macros, and review habits already live. Business teams, on the other hand, are more comfortable reviewing and commenting in a browser-based editor, such as Google Docs or OnlyOffice where they can move quickly without downloading files or managing tracked changes.

If your contract management system supports both environments, you remove one of the biggest sources of friction in the review cycle. 

‍

3. Connect Salesforce and procurement systems 

When you force your sales team to leave your CRM to check contract status, or make procurement chase updates in long email chains, you’re sacrificing focus and speed. By embedding your contract management system directly into the platforms your teams already live in, like your CRM for Sales and your sourcing/procurement system for Procurement, you eliminate app-toggling and context shifts. Digital contract lifecycle systems integrated across functions reduce administrative burden, cut review delays and improve collaboration between legal, sales and procurement.

‍

4. Automate Approval Workflows

Approvals buried in inboxes cause avoidable delays. Automated routing, reminders, and escalation keep work moving while maintaining a clear audit trail of who approved what and when. Modern legal-ops guidance emphasizes standard workflows, approval processes, e-signatures, reporting, and expiration alerts as core capabilities. Research from the Association of Corporate Counsel indicates that teams with standardized approval workflows, routing, e-signatures, and reporting capabilities face fewer avoidable delays and maintain clearer audit trails.

‍

5. Maintain a single source of truth

When you shift contract work away from scattered emails and into one system, collaboration becomes simpler for every team.

• You give Sales a live view of where each contract stands.
• You help Legal focus on review quality instead of searching through attachments.
• You help Procurement track supplier obligations and renewals in the same timeline.

CLM Legal Solutions notes that a truly data-driven legal department requires a contract management system that collects and shares data seamlessly across functions.

Conclusion

When contracts move out of inboxes and into a shared workspace, collaboration becomes more predictable for every team involved. Sales gains clarity on deal progress without chasing updates. Legal gets a cleaner review cycle with fewer errors and fewer duplicate drafts. Procurement operates with better visibility into obligations and renewals. Integrated systems. centralized version control. and automated approvals create a contracting process that is faster. more transparent. and easier to manage at scale. This alignment across teams reduces value leakage and helps the business operate with greater control and confidence.
‍

FAQ

Q1. Why is email risky for contract collaboration?
Email threads create version confusion and expose teams to misaddressed or unsecured attachments. Research from the American Bar Association highlights that centralized collaboration with tracked history reduces these risks and improves accuracy.
‍
Q2. Do we need to move off Microsoft Word?
‍No. The goal is to keep Word available for Legal while syncing edits to the shared workspace so business users can review in-app without creating parallel versions. Best-practice guidance favors tools that fit existing workflows. 

Q3. How does integrating CRM and procurement tools help in contract management?
‍It reduces context switching and the “toggle tax.” Leaders get meaningful status in the systems they already use, and teams avoid duplicating updates across apps. 

Q4. What Should a Contract Management Approval Workflow Include
‍Role-based routing, reminders, escalation paths, e-signature, audit logs, and SLA visibility.  Legal-ops frameworks from the Association of Corporate Counsel underline these as foundational capabilities for predictable approvals.

Q5. How do we show impact to the business?
‍Track cycle time reduction, approval delays, first response times, negotiation duration, and renewal outcomes. World Commerce and Contracting notes that organizations that use contract data for operational decision making improve performance alignment and reduce value leakage across the contract lifecycle. EY' analysis supports the same trend across large enterprises.