Bridging the gap between politicians & companies with Jules Polonetsky, CEO, Future of Privacy Forum
Summary
Key Insights
1. Privacy Is About Responsible Data Use, Not Just Legal Compliance
Jules argues that most privacy failures don’t come from breaking the law — they come from making poor judgment calls about how data is used.
A company can technically comply with regulations and still lose user trust.
Strong privacy programs focus on whether a use of data is appropriate, fair, and expected — not just whether it is permitted.
2. Consent Is No Longer a Sufficient Safeguard
Modern products collect and process data in ways users can’t realistically understand through notices or checkboxes.
Jules explains that relying solely on consent shifts too much responsibility onto users.
Instead, companies must take ownership of decisions about secondary use, data sharing, and downstream impacts.
3. Product Teams, Not Lawyers Alone, Shape Privacy Outcomes
The most important privacy decisions are made during product design:
- what data is collected,
- how long it’s retained,
- who can access it,
- and how it’s reused.
Legal teams add the most value when they engage early and help product teams evaluate tradeoffs before launch.
4. Sector Context Matters More Than One-Size-Fits-All Rules
Jules highlights how privacy expectations vary dramatically across sectors.
Data practices that may be acceptable in advertising can be harmful in health or education contexts.
Effective privacy governance adapts principles to context instead of applying rigid rules across all products.
5. Regulators Are Looking for Good-Faith Governance, Not Perfection
According to Jules, regulators increasingly evaluate whether companies:
- identified risks,
- considered alternatives,
- documented decisions,
- and acted responsibly.
Programs that demonstrate thoughtfulness and internal accountability fare better than checkbox compliance.
6. Trust Is Built Through Consistency and Restraint
Using data simply because you can often backfires.
Jules emphasizes restraint as a competitive advantage — companies that limit data use to what users reasonably expect are more likely to maintain long-term trust.
7. Closing Insight
The strongest privacy programs aren’t built on fear of enforcement — they’re built on judgment, restraint, and trust.
Jules’s perspective shows why GCs are central to making privacy a durable business advantage, not just a compliance exercise.
In this podcast, we cover
0:00 Introduction
2:04 Getting a start in New York politics
12:53 Running for elected office
18:31 Taking one of the first Chief Privacy Officer roles in the industry at DoubleClick
26:57 Considering the necessary training to be successful in privacy
34:52 Founding the Future of Privacy Forum
48:14 Questioning the death of the Chief Privacy Officer role
55:54 Favorite part of your day-to-day work and professional pet peeves
1:00:54 Book recommendations
1:04:21 What you wish you’d known as a young lawyer































.avif)







.avif)








